Canadian business news — Ottawa has run out of patience with Cleveland-Cliffs. On October 22, Federal Industry Minister Mélanie Joly sent the Ohio-based steel giant the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter, giving it 15 days to reverse planned layoffs at its Hamilton Stelco operations or face court action. Up to 500 jobs are on the line, and this time the fight is not about tariffs. It is about promises the company put in writing when it bought Stelco in 2024.
By Maplestime Business Desk | Ottawa, Ontario | October 23, 2026
Sources: Political Press, Seeking Alpha, Metal.com | Last updated: October 23, 2026
Key Takeaways
- The Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter, obtained by Radio-Canada, gives Cleveland-Cliffs 15 days to undo planned layoffs at Hamilton Works or face a superior court action.
- Ottawa says the cuts violate binding job commitments under the Investment Canada Act from the 2024 purchase: at least the same number of unionized employees as in 2024, and the vast majority of non-unionized employees, through 2029.
- Under section 40 of the Act, the minister can ask a court for monetary penalties, an order to divest from Stelco, and fines of $10,000 for every day the company stays in breach.
- Cleveland-Cliffs announced in late September it would idle Hamilton Works cold-rolled and coated steel operations, affecting up to 500 workers, and blamed U.S. tariffs.
- Joly rejects the excuse outright: “no act of God or change in market conditions can relieve Cleveland-Cliffs of the commitments it made to Canada. Those commitments are not optional.”
- The letter also alleges CEO Lourenco Goncalves lobbied Washington to impose heavy tariffs on Canadian steel and diverted production from Stelco to U.S. operations before the cuts.
What the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter Says
The Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter went out Thursday, October 22, 2026, and Radio-Canada obtained a copy. Its message is blunt. Cleveland-Cliffs has 15 days to reverse the planned layoffs at Hamilton Works. If it does not, Joly says she will take the company to a superior court under section 40 of the Investment Canada Act.
This is not a press release or a negotiating posture. A section 40 demand letter is the federal government’s formal enforcement tool for foreign investment undertakings. Once the 15 days run out, the minister’s options include asking a judge for monetary penalties and, in the extreme, an order forcing Cleveland-Cliffs to divest from Stelco entirely. Legal observers say the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter is the sharpest use of this enforcement tool in years.
Why Ottawa Says the Cuts Break Binding Promises
When Cleveland-Cliffs bought Stelco in 2024, the deal came with strings attached. Under the Investment Canada Act, the company committed to keep at least the same number of unionized employees as Stelco had in 2024, and the vast majority of non-unionized employees, through 2029. These are binding commitments, not aspirational targets.
Joly’s letter argues that idling the cold-rolled and coated steel operations at Hamilton Works, and cutting up to 500 workers, is a direct breach of those undertakings. The government approved the 2024 purchase on the basis of those job promises. In Ottawa’s reading, Cleveland-Cliffs cannot cash the cheque and then tear up the receipt. That is the breach the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter is built on.
The $10,000-a-Day Question
Section 40 of the Investment Canada Act gives the industry minister real teeth. If the breach is not fixed, Joly can ask a superior court for monetary penalties against the company. The Act also provides for fines of $10,000 for each day the company remains in breach of its undertakings. Every day of non-compliance after the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter deadline deepens that exposure.
The nuclear option is divestiture. A court can order a foreign buyer to sell off the Canadian business entirely. It has rarely been used, which is exactly why this Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter matters. Joly is putting the most severe remedy in the statute on the table in the first paragraph, not the last.
Joly Dismisses the Tariff Excuse
Cleveland-Cliffs said in late September that it would idle the Hamilton Works cold-rolled and coated steel operations because of U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel. Up to 500 workers would be affected. The company framed it as a market decision forced on it from Washington.
Joly is not buying it. The Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter makes that rejection formal: “No act of God or change in market conditions can relieve Cleveland-Cliffs of the commitments it made to Canada,” she wrote. “Those commitments are not optional.”
The letter goes further. It alleges that CEO Lourenco Goncalves personally lobbied the U.S. government to impose heavy tariffs on Canadian steel, and that the company diverted production from Stelco to its U.S. operations before announcing the Hamilton cuts. In other words, Ottawa is accusing Cleveland-Cliffs of helping to create the very market conditions it now cites as an excuse.
What Happens in the Next 15 Days
The clock on the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter started October 22, which puts the deadline in the first week of November. Cleveland-Cliffs has three real options: reverse the layoffs and get back in compliance, try to negotiate revised undertakings with Ottawa, or call the minister’s bluff and prepare for court.
None of those are cheap. Reversing means absorbing losses on operations it wanted to idle. Negotiating means conceding that the original commitments still bind. And fighting the federal government in a superior court over a breach of the Investment Canada Act is a fight no foreign investor wants to be seen losing.
For Hamilton, the stakes are immediate. These are unionized industrial jobs in a city where steel is not just an industry but an identity. For the rest of Canada, the stakes are the message. Foreign buyers have made job promises under the Investment Canada Act for decades, and enforcement has often looked like a paper tiger. Whatever path Cleveland-Cliffs takes, the Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter has already changed the math for every foreign buyer watching from the sidelines. Joly is betting that this time, the teeth are real. The Stelco Layoffs Demand Letter is the document that will prove her right or wrong.
Maplestime will provide updates from the Stelco Hamilton layoffs fight as announcements are made.
Have a tip about the Stelco layoffs? Email [email protected]
Have a correction? Email [email protected]
Do you think a foreign buyer should be allowed to gut a Canadian steel town after signing binding job promises, or is Ottawa finally enforcing the rules the way it should have from the start? Tell us in the comments. And share this with every Canadian who believes Canadian jobs deserve real protection, not just paperwork.
Enjoying Maplestime? Support independent Canadian journalism — no paywall, no corporate owners.
